“Lumentum is at the forefront of the cloud and AI revolution, which is driving rapid growth in the advanced photonics markets we serve.” (CEO)
“We now expect to surpass $600 million in quarterly revenue by the June 2026 quarter or earlier.” (CEO)
“Fourth quarter revenue of $480.7 million and non-GAAP EPS of $0.88 were both above the high end of our revised guidance ranges.” (CFO)
“In Components, we achieved an all-time high in EML shipments, nearly doubling the revenue compared to our June quarter 2024 baseline.” (CEO)
“We just received the largest single purchase commitment in company history. For our ultra high-power lasers...” (CEO)
Prepared Metrics
Metric
Value
Speaker/Context
Q4 总营收
4.807 亿美元
CFO (prepared)
Q4 非 GAAP 毛利率
37.8%
CFO (prepared)
Q4 非 GAAP 营业利润率
15.0%
CFO (prepared)
Q4 非 GAAP 摊薄每股收益
0.88 美元
CFO (prepared)
Q4 云与网络部门营收
4.241 亿美元
CFO (prepared)
Q4 云与网络部门利润率
23.6%
CFO (prepared)
Q4 工业技术部门营收
5,660 万美元
CFO (prepared)
Q4 工业技术部门利润率
6.0%
CFO (prepared)
Q4 资本支出
5,900 万美元
CFO (prepared)
现金和短期投资
8.77 亿美元
CFO (prepared)
2025 财年总营收
16.5 亿美元
CFO (prepared)
2025 财年非 GAAP 毛利率
34.7%
CFO (prepared)
2025 财年非 GAAP 营业利润率
9.7%
CFO (prepared)
2025 财年非 GAAP 摊薄每股收益
2.06 美元
CFO (prepared)
Q&A Batch (1-5 of 5)
Q1 — Simon Matthew Leopold
Topic: OCS revenue ramp trajectory and CPO competitive positioning
Key points:
OCS revenue now expected earlier than prior December quarter target; third customer added.
Ramp described as gradual with first meaningful inflection in early 2026, more significant in back half of 2026.
Current OCS revenue limited by manufacturing capacity in Thailand.
CPO meaningful revenue expected in second half of calendar 2026; company believes it is sole-sourced with a competitive moat based on unique power level and reliability.
Mgmt stance: Bullish — demand exceeds supply for OCS; confident in maintaining sole-source CPO position due to technology lead.
Q2 — Thomas James O'Malley
Topic: Path to $600 million quarterly revenue and competitive dynamics in 3D sensing
Key points:
Path to $600 million driven by continued strength in components, a dramatic acceleration in cloud modules from December quarter onward, and layering in of OCS revenue.
Cloud modules saw a 50% sequential gain in the reported quarter.
3D sensing expected to be a minimal part of the business going forward, but mgmt feels it is picking up share with decent margins this cycle.
Mgmt stance: Bullish — multiple growth vectors support the revenue target; innovation lead may drive share gains in 3D sensing.
Q3 — Samik Chatterjee
Topic: Timing of $600 million revenue target and tariff impact assessment
Key points:
Mgmt used the phrase "June quarter or earlier" for the $600 million target, citing broad-based strength.
No single sector expected to decline outside of Industrial Tech.
Company determined its products are exempted from new tariff regulations; minimal tariff impact seen in Q4.
Mgmt stance: Bullish — business trajectory is strong with potential to hit the target earlier; neutral on tariffs due to product exemptions.
Q4 — Ezra Gabriel Weener
Topic: 100G/200G EML transition dynamics and demand visibility
Key points:
100G EML (for 800G) is run-rate and continuing to climb; 200G EML (for 1.6T) is additive and in early ramp.
1.6T module business expected to feather in next year.
Demand visibility is 6 to 9 months; market is supply-constrained with very low inventory.
Mgmt stance: Bullish — 200G layers on top of growing 100G business; supply-constrained environment supports strong demand.
Q5 — Unidentified Analyst (Aaron Actel)
Topic: EML competitive edge and segment mix tracking
Key points:
Competitive edge based on best-performing design (leading to higher module yields for customers) and largest capacity from Japan fab.
Datacom is shipping slightly ahead of the 45% telecom / 45% datacom mix target due to supply constraints on the telecom side, though underlying demand is balanced.
Underlying demand for telecom products is also driven by cloud hyperscalers.
Mgmt stance: Bullish — technical and operational leadership provides a tailwind; mix shift is supply-driven, not demand-driven.